The Narrow Gate

Welcome to the continuation of my blog, post-seminary. Ministry and evangelism have brought me back home to Chattanooga. I welcome your company on my journey.

The original blog, Down In Mississippi, shared stories from 2008 and 2009 of the hope and determination of people in the face of disaster wrought by the hurricanes Rita and Katrina in 2005, of work done primarily by volunteers from churches across America and with financial support of many aid agencies and private donations and the Church. My Mississippi posts really ended with the post of August 16, 2009. Much work, especially for the neediest, remained undone after the denominational church pulled out. Such is the nature of institutions. The world still needs your hands for a hand up. I commend to you my seven stories, Down in Mississippi I -VII, at the bottom of this page and the blog posts. They describe an experience of grace.



Friday, February 19, 2016

Day 1166 – You Were Not Willing

A Reflection on a Bible Study at Second Presbyterian Church, Feb. 18, 2016, Chattanooga, TN.
The text: Luke 13:31-35  (Also the reading from the Revised Common Lectionary for this Sunday)
Luke gives us this passage exclusively among the synoptic gospels and it seems to achieve several ends. We know Herod was curious about Jesus (he beheaded John the Baptist) but this passage reveals the intent of his curiosity. This passage also conveys a second and third message from Jesus, that neither Herod (or any person) will prevent Jesus from reaching his goal. We do not know from the first two verses what is its goal, but Jesus makes it clear he is bound to another Higher authority. Finally, Jesus has an ominous lament for religious leaders and followers who fail to acknowledge his authority.
Only when Jesus laments over Jerusalem do we begin to understand what lies ahead. His draws upon Jeremiah 22:5 and Ps 118:26 lamenting that he came to gather God’s chosen together but they are not willing.
If you read the preceding verses 22-30, sometimes called “the judgment of the nations,” you will see how our verses are closely connected. Those verses describe the path to new life in the Kingdom of God as a narrow gate and reflect to the leaders of the synagogue, and by extension to the whole people of Israel, the reality placed upon them to accept or reject the Messiah and discover their own reception or rejection in the kingdom of God.
Reading verse 31 leaves one wondering, are the Pharisees trying by ruse to get Jesus to leave their presence and avoid Jerusalem? Or have they for some reason joined alliance with him against Herod, a theologically traitorous, Jewish king? One thing is certain these verses validate that Herod’s preoccupation with Jesus has a nefarious intent.
Hearing the word of Jesus in verse 32 leaves us wondering is Jesus being literal or figurative where he says, “…today, tomorrow and on the third day “I am finished.” .”) Since we are “educated” readers who know the final outcome we know Jesus can mean “Until I reach my goal,” rather than “I am finished
Yet Luke presents an intentionally ambiguous account. Is Jesus referring to his ongoing work of that will occupy his time until he reaches Jerusalem, or is Jesus presaging his final hours on the third day when he ascends to heaven fully completing his task seated at the right hand of God, saying in effect, no earthly power being Herod or Satan shall short circuit his mission?
Whatever the conclusion, verse 33 lets us know something ominous lies ahead in Jerusalem. One commentator (p. 743) suggested that we can translate the irony in 32-33 as “if you, Israel and Judah, must reject those sent you by God, then let’s have you do it properly, by doing it at the heart of all Jewish affairs in Jerusalem.”
Verses 33-34 take a turn towards a lament. Jesus draw attention to prophets being killed in Jerusalem. This is a vague sort of history. We do have events such as 2 Chronicles 24:17-23 where a king induced the people in Jerusalem to worship other gods, and Zechariah son of the high priest called them out and was stoned to death for doing it. We also know Jeremiah was imprisoned for his prophesy about King Hezekiah, and was thrown in a dry well. The theme in the preceding verses (Luke 13:22-30) and in v 35 draws heavily upon the prophesy of Jeremiah 22:1-8. Here is the concluding part of that passage:
6 “You are like Gilead to me,
                        like the summit of Lebanon;
            but I swear that I will make you a desert,
                        an uninhabited city.
7          I will prepare destroyers against you,
                        all with their weapons;
            they shall cut down your choicest cedars
                        and cast them into the fire.
8   And many nations will pass by this city, and all of them will say one to another, “Why has the LORD dealt in this way with that great city?”
These five verses pack a lot of weight. They pose and answer some core questions about the rejection of Jesus by Jerusalem (a placeholder for the entire religious establishment and those who fall under its sway?).
Can Herod forestall or short-circuit the completion of the calling of Jesus? The answer of course, as Jesus says, is entirely NO.
Is the tragedy that Herod desires to kill Jesus who must flee? No. Jesus will not flee. The tragedy is that Jerusalem for whom he has come will spurn him and its leaders turn upon him. The companion tragedy is that Jeremiah’s prophecy will be fulfilled.
Reflection:
The challenge with texts such as this one is how should we as Christians read and apply them? Do we read the judgment passage (v34-35) as judgment of the exiting Jewish religious establishment, or as a yardstick for us, or our country and its leaders?
In other words is the lament of Jesus universally applied, or is Jesus talking especially to God’s own special chosen people for whom he has a special bond, and has always promised to send a Messiah?” Many times Jesus called the ruling religious establishment to task for having turned from the call of the Law, to hold the Law in one’s heart so that one’s way of life reflects it.  That rebuke must also apply to those penitent Jews who read and know the Law. I come away thinking this passage principally is directed at Jerusalem.
However, if we come away from our study of Christianity discovering only one message, it might well be that the ministry of Jesus is a universal call to every believer to “walk the talk,” that is to have one’s way of life reflects Christ’s walk (presence) in the world.
A precept of Reformed theology is that we are all ministers. Does this passage then also by extension apply to us personally as it did to the scribes, Pharisees and priests?

Are we ministers giving lip service to the good news and the God of the Living by spreading judgment not grace, or are we willing followers of Jesus who can reply gracefully to any judgment against us, “I a living witness of the good news by my words and deeds today and tomorrow, and to the day I have finished my work and am called home”?

No comments: