The Narrow Gate
Welcome to the continuation of my blog, post-seminary. Ministry and evangelism have brought me back home to Chattanooga. I welcome your company on my journey.
The original blog, Down In Mississippi, shared stories from 2008 and 2009 of the hope and determination of people in the face of disaster wrought by the hurricanes Rita and Katrina in 2005, of work done primarily by volunteers from churches across America and with financial support of many aid agencies and private donations and the Church. My Mississippi posts really ended with the post of August 16, 2009. Much work, especially for the neediest, remained undone after the denominational church pulled out. Such is the nature of institutions. The world still needs your hands for a hand up. I commend to you my seven stories, Down in Mississippi I -VII, at the bottom of this page and the blog posts. They describe an experience of grace.
Thursday, September 29, 2016
Day 1389 - Is there a reward for being faithful?
A Bible Study of Luke 17:1-10 at Second
Presbyterian Church, Chattanooga, TN, September 29, 2016
The revised common lectionary excises verses 1-4 from verses 1 -10, leaving us only
with the parable in vv5-10.
The ten verses are addressed to both
disciples and apostles, or leaders of the
church (as v5 states). On one level these verses can be parsed and
stand on their own; but Luke has weaved them into a whole that needs to be
appreciated to get the full import of the message of the parable. Verses 1-4 set the
circumstances for verses 5-10.
Let’s read and see. At the beginning of each section I pose the circumstance or
question the verses seem to address.
Causing a brother or sister to sin:
Luke 17:1-2
The Greek word translated “stumbling” (scandal in modern usage) is
an unusual (rare) word in Biblical Greek, “skandalon,”
and it really means something like “ensnared,” or “caught in a trap.” Hence we
can use the sense of sinning. The Greek also uses a word translated as “but” in
verse 1 that actually imparts a very strong intensity or emphasis to the verb
“woe,” “But woe to anyone by whom they (stumbling) comes.”
“Little ones” in verse 2, should remind you
of Luke’s frequent quoting of Jesus referring to children both literally and figuratively. This makes a connection for us to both true
children, to persons who have newly come upon faith, and to mature persons who
still are children of God.
Treating one who sins against you:
Luke 17:3-4
These four verses establish an ethical
standard for the worshipping congregation. We have to bring the historical
context into the present and explore whether we want to apply that ethical
standard today if we want to really make sense of and use the parable in verses 7-10. (Remember a
parable is a metaphorical structure in a historical context that has the power
to be generalized for today’s circumstances.) We will return to this question
in the Reflection.
Forgiveness is another common theme found
in Luke. You may be thinking of the version of this in Matthew. But here the
message, “everywhere repentance is found, forgiveness must be accorded” is good
enough.
How can we do it?: Luke 17: 5-6
According to Fred
Craddock, Luke’s Greek word usage to account for what Jesus said is not
reprimanding as if they did not have enough faith, but affirming that they do.
In Craddock’s words, “Small faith cancels out ‘impossible.’” Thus the sentence
fragment “If you had faith…” means, “If you had faith, and you do have it…” The
amount of faith is not important, but provenance of genuine faith is the fundamentally,
essentially important thing.
A
parable saying “There is no such this as ‘above the call of duty’”: Luke 17:7-10
The parable begins with a
rhetorical question, “Who among you would…” whose clear implication is, “No one would.”
Notice how Jesus forces us
into the master’s position. This is a little remarkable to me, as Jesus usually
is subtler allowing the listener to decide where one stands. It is the classic style of the parable
however to begin and encourage us to cast ourselves with a supposed protagonist
(“good guy,” in this cast the master) but at the end, as usual, to have
everything turned upside down by casting us with the least expected actor, in
this case the lot of the slave.
Reflection
Jesus spells out two sets
of “ethical standards” of Christian fellowship in verses 1-4.
Ask yourself, “What is the
first issue?,” or “What threatens the fellowship of living in the community of
faithful?”
One issue has to do with our
maturity. Are we all on the same
level of maturity or are there “little ones” such as newly baptized/new members
(a common theme in Paul’s letters to congregations he started, see Corinthians).
We say also the mature are free and responsible to the Lord and can chose to do
anything that does not diminish faith, but on the other hand, the law of love (to
avoid our actions causing another to stumble) trumps the law of freedom.
The second issue has to do
with those among us who work against or sin against us. In the face of an
injustice, we are to forgive and accept repentance. The step of measuring the magnitude
of repentance of one who asks for forgiveness is embarking on the road of
judging, not forgiving.
The unstated premise in this parable is
that among the entwined fellowship of Christians there is an ethical standard and
violating that ethical standard is sin. This is a profound yardstick, because
it says, “What we do is not just our business but the community’s.”
It is a major crisis of the present
time whether we actually still hold to this ethical standard as something every
community of faith should explicitly follow. We can’t really move beyond the
sayings and parable without agreeing to this reality.
To say these ethical standards are a
heavy burden understates the matter. It is no wonder the apostles (not just the disciples but the apostles, or leaders of
the Lord’s Church) ask for more faith!
To appreciate the parable also we must
accept the context of slavery, regardless of how objectionable it is. This is
an essential part of the parable. Slavery is loathed by everyone, then and now.
No one wants or wanted to be a slave. In ancient Palestine slavery, although
every person loathed the idea of being a slave, was an accepted reality. We
have to attempt to place our self in that context to understand the parable.
This parable describes a “small
homeowner” who has perhaps a single slave who has double duty, work outside in
the field and work inside fixing dinner for example. The slave’s time belongs
to the master and when the master’s tasks are done, the slave can turn to his
own tasks. There is no ground for a slave to boast, the slave has a duty to perform.
Keeping this image in mind also helps us understand the power of the reversal in
Jesus’ words that to lead one must be a servant (slave).
When we tie this conclusion of the
parable to verse 5, the
parable is addressing a question to the leaders (apostles) of the church, “Are
you a servant of God, or are you cruising and seeking ‘your fair share’?” It
also points to the faulty idea that if my faith is increased, some kind of perk
or reward must come along with it.
The reality of this parable is that we
have no special “claim” upon God, rather everything we have is on loan from
God.
When Jesus calls us “worthless slaves”
we must recall both his words that to be a master one must be a slave, that the
ultimate virtue of a slave is humility or subservience, and that Rome believes
the ultimate virtue was power.
What does Paul say defines the acme of
virtue? (Philippians 2:1-12).
This passage in Philippians, written long before Luke penned his gospel captures
the essence of the humility demanded in this parable. It is the humility the
Lord used when he faced Rome to defeat the power of death. As an aside, this
passage in Philippians is believed to be the earliest hymn of affirmation of
faith.
In the quite extensive, hedonistic
society within which we live, these ideas may seem alien, if not irrelevant. Who
brooks a slight? The reality of following the Way is that whether we are in the
field or the house, we are still servants/slaves to the Lord. We may politely
translate the Greek word as “servant” because “slave” is so repugnant, but the
reality of grace is we are worthless to receive something that is freely given to
us. Jesus is telling us in these
verses three things about the duty of one who avows to follow the Way: (1) to
avoid causing someone to stumble, (2) to accord forgiveness to those who repent,
(3) to live by faith.
We can conclude that this unmerited
gift of grace has no justification in value we bring to it. If there is no
justification or value we bring, then it is a gift to the unworthy. How can
there be a reward for accepting a gift for which we have no merit? There is no
reward for being faithful save its reality as our act of accepting the gift acknowledging
our loyalty and subservience to the Lord. Doesn’t the part of the Westminster
Shorter Catechism inscribed on the
gate of McCallie School embody this parable? “The chief end of humanity is to
glorify God and enjoy his grace forever.”
Amen
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment